Afghan General On Canadian Troops

2 replies [Last post]
bp
Offline
Joined: 01/22/2008

A good read:

KABUL -- Kandahar, where Canadian forces are responsible for security, is no longer the most hazardous place in Afghanistan, according to a senior Afghan general.

"It is now Helmand that is the most dangerous, not Kandahar," said Gen. Zahir Azimi in an interview over lunch this week in the Afghan capital.

"This is because Canadian troops have done a great job in their area. They have changed Kandahar from being the most volatile place to the second most volatile place."

The general, who was dressed in a sharp business suit rather than the motley green battle fatigues favoured by most Afghan commanders, said with a smile that such an improvement might not sound like much to outsiders, but "this is real progress. The Taliban had control of Panjwaii, Zhari and Arghandab districts [in Kandahar], but that changed after Operation Medusa and the situation continues to improve."

Medusa was the code name for a bloody, large-scale combat operation against the Taliban to the west of Kandahar City in the late summer and fall of 2006. It was mostly led by a battle group from the Royal Canadian Regiment which replaced a similar group from the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry when they rotated back to Canada early in the battle.

The general, who fought the Red Army during the 1980s, and is now senior spokesman for the Defence Ministry, said the simplest way to defeat the Taliban was "to heighten the capacity of the Afghan army."

In support of his argument he cited a recent Washington Post opinion piece by Senator Joe Lieberman in which he said the cost of having one foreign soldier in Afghanistan was 60 to 70 times higher than the cost of one Afghan soldier.

"What is needed is for the international community to agree on the size of the Afghan National Army required to defend the country," Azimi said.

As for the right size for the army, the general thought that "200,000 is a very realistic number."

That was about 120,000 more troops than the current intended size of the Afghan force which, Lieberman wrote, was "nowhere near the numbers to secure [Afghanistan] against an increasingly sophisticated insurgency."

Turning to the question of narcotics, which are believed to provide the Taliban with much of its funding, Azimi complained that the international community was "like an ostrich" that had failed to understand the problem because it "tried to make this a political issue when it is an issue that should be dealt with directly."

bp
Offline
Joined: 01/22/2008
Female Afghan Politician on Canada's Involvement

An interview in Macleans:

To understand why Fawzia Koofi, deputy speaker of the lower house of Afghanistan’s National Assembly, describes her country’s current turmoil as its “golden age,” it helps to know what her life was like before the fall of the Taliban.

In 1996, she was a 21-year-old medical student in Kabul with a seemingly bright future ahead of her. In September of that year, the Taliban captured Afghanistan’s capital and forbid women from getting an education. “I had nothing to do but get married,” she says in an interview with Maclean’s during a visit to Canada with five other Afghan women parliamentarians.

Ten days after her marriage, the Taliban arrested Koofi’s husband, Hamid Ahmadi, for the crime of marrying Koofi, whose father was a member of parliament during the reign of King Muhammad Zahir Shah. A local Taliban commander at the jail threw rocks at Koofi to keep her away from the prison. Her husband, Ahmadi, was tortured and kept in freezing conditions, which led to him contracting tuberculosis. He was released after three months. Koofi fled with her husband to Badakshan, a region of Afghanistan controlled by the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. But Ahmadi’s sickness was terminal. He died several years later, leaving Koofi to raise two daughters on her own.

“That made me stronger,” she says. “It made me think about politics and working against fundamentalism and against people who impose their ideas on women in the name of Islam. That’s how I came to politics.”

Koofi returned to Kabul after the Taliban were overthrown and successfully ran for office as a representative of Badakshan province. She also enrolled in law school and will soon graduate.

“These are golden years for many reasons,” she says. “First of all is the fact that we have a democratically elected parliament.  We have 68 women in the lower house. We have the international community’s attention. This is an opportunity for us to build our country.”

Koofi doesn’t gloss over the problems that Afghanistan is facing, not least of all rising insecurity and the growing reach of the Taliban. “I’m not optimistic. I’m realistic,” she says. “With all the good things that are happening in Afghanistan, we face challenges. Fundamentalism is in a growth process. You have certain characters within the government even that do not believe in democracy. There are fundamentalist figures that have influenced the government. Those are the threats we face in Afghanistan, but we have to keep going.”

Women politicians face unique challenges. Some of Koofi’s fellow parliamentarians don’t even want to sit under the same roof as her, believing that doing so violates sharia, or Islamic law. And in a patriarchal society, women seldom have the money and power that tends to help political careers. On the other hand, Koofi says, women politicians in Afghanistan are developing a reputation for honesty that is earning them the support of voters.

Koofi believes that Afghanistan’s government needs to be much more decentralized to take into account its ethnic and geographic diversity. She’d also like to see the creation of the position of prime minister. In the meantime, she says, her country’s biggest challenge is the Taliban’s resurgence. She blames this primarily on the support the movement gets from Pakistan and abroad.

“We cannot afford to support democracy in Afghanistan and dictatorship in Pakistan,” she says. “Now, you have 37 countries in Afghanistan. With 37 countries, we are not able to defeat a small group of fundamentalists because the links [to extremists in Pakistan] have become very strong.”

Koofi points to the lawless, tribal areas of Pakistan, largely inhabited by Pashtuns, the same ethnic group that comprises most of the Taliban. Much of this territory, which borders Afghanistan, is beyond the formal control of Pakistan’s government and many Taliban recruits originate there. She says the Pakistani government needs to move into these areas – not just to hunt down extremists, but also to economically and politically integrate the people who live there into the Pakistani state.

Many analysts and politicians – most notably Jack Layton of the NDP – have suggested that the Afghan government should attempt to negotiate peace with the Taliban, especially its more moderate elements. “We don’t reject the principle of negotiations and discussions and talks,” Koofi says, “but it’s very important to make a definition of what we mean by moderate Taliban.” She says that there are “small commanders here and there” who can be integrated into Afghanistan’s democracy, just like any other citizen. But she cautions that most of these minor warlords don’t have much influence.

The Taliban’s top leaders might be powerful, Koofi says, but they are so opposed to Afghanistan’s fledgling democracy that she sees little room for negotiations. “Mullah Omar, Taliban leaders linked to al-Qaeda, they have their own constitution – the constitution of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. They don’t respect our constitution. They don’t respect our values and the democracy that we have created over the last five or six years. They don’t respect women’s rights at all. So how do we share power?” 

Koofi is aware, of course, of the debate in Canada over this country’s future involvement in Afghanistan, and she is careful to be diplomatic when discussing the topic. She hopes Parliament will vote to extend Canada’s mission in Afghanistan until 2011, and then “we will talk about it.”  She stresses, however, that the fight against Islamist extremism in Afghanistan is one with international repercussions.

“Before September 11, we were shouting in Afghanistan that we were the victims of terrorism, but the international community was saying it’s a civil war. Well, the extension of that civil war came to the twin buildings. That’s when the international community realized, ‘OK, the Afghan people are suffering from terrorism. Now we have to help them.’ If you don’t help Afghan people fight terrorism today, tomorrow, those same terrorists will come to your own border.”

“The Canadian public is pessimistic because you lose your soldiers in Afghanistan. Canada has lost 80 soldiers. This is absolutely understandable,” she says. “But in the meantime, we are building the police. We are building the army. The situation in Afghanistan is worth this sacrifice.”

paganmystic
Offline
Joined: 10/12/2008
This is an awesome article

I am just ashamed of the CBC because they are obligated to all Canadians to show all Canadians the whole truth of our work under NATO by public trust which in return they recieve public funding. For that reason they have been lying to us.

I wish to use this article in public venues I am in, online. Is that possible? Naturally the by-line will be used so all Canadians who want more information can get it.