Canada Supports Photo Exhibit of Afghanistan Through Afghan Eyes

Students in the second round of photography classes funded by the Canadian Embassy in Kabul graduated on June 8. Canadian Ambassador William Crosbie welcomed the students who were among the first visitors to the new embassy building.

 “The world has seen many pictures of Afghanistan.” Crosbie told the graduates. “We wanted to see Afghanistan through Afghan eyes.”
 
The first cohort, funded by UNESCO, graduated in February 2010. In both rounds a total of 68 students participated in the classes, including 14 girls.
 
The classes were conducted by Aina Photo Agency, and run by Fahim Dashty, editor in chief of Kabul Weekly. The teachers, including myself, volunteered for the project, and conducted classes covering the basics of photography, camera techniques, Photoshop and the history of photography. 
 
The total cost of training was approximately $25,000 dollars (CAD). The Canadian Ambassador also visited Aina Photo Agency during the course.
 
In order to be eligible for the class, students needed to be high-school graduates, under 35 years old and have a basic command of English and computer skills. But most participants were students from Kabul University or other private tertiary schools.
 
The classes ran six days per week and also included practical parts such as photo-taking around Kabul.
 
 “We request the Canadian government continues its support for the idea, as small changes can make a big difference,” said Dashty.
 
Fifty photos taken by the graduates will be turned into a photography book. They’ll also be part of an exhibition shown in Kabul’s historic Babur Garden. There are plans to have an exhibition of the students’ photos, in Ottawa.
 
Aside from Kabul scenes, the exhibition will also include photographs from the Afghanistan’s provinces. They were taken by three students from the class, including two women, who spent a week traveling, thanks to financial support from Canada.
 
“Such training contributes to a professional press, which supports freedom of expression,” said Gulbudeen Ellham, the head teacher.
 
Some Afghan media outlets are now calling for the establishing of a press club for Afghan journalists in Kabul, modelled on the one recently opened in Kandahar.
 
Having decided to pull out the troops in 2011 Canada should start turning its attention to nation building aspects. Due to the Canadian troop deployment in Kandahar interest in that province is understandable. However in order for Canada to keep up its good reputation among Afghans Canada should expand on its non-military activities across Afghanistan equally.
 
Contributed by Ahmad Zia Kechkenni
Posted by Jonathon Narvey on June 21, 2010 - 10:40am

CASC on CTV. Violence Against Children in Afghanistan

Watch CASC's Terry Glavin on CTV, discussing the latest Taliban brutality against women and children in Afghanistan:

The overwhelming majority of Afghans want and believe in the notion that girls should be able to go to school, that women should be able to go to work, to run for and hold political office. The Taliban is despised by the vast majority of the country and it seems to me Canadians should start talking very seriously about what Canada should be doing in Afghanistan post-2011.

Posted by Jonathon Narvey on June 15, 2010 - 2:08pm

Take Action on Afghanistan. Write Your MP. Engage the Media

Hello CASC Members

 
We have good news to report, but we need your help.

There are seeds of hope in Ottawa regarding the future of our commitment to democracy in Afghanistan. And as you may notice, it sounds remarkably similar to what we called for in our report, Keeping Our Promises.

 
Bob Rae is the Liberal Party's foreign affairs critic and a member of the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan. After the Special Committee made a five-day trip to Afghanistan, Rae generated headlines across the country with his comments:
 
"We have an obligation to see this thing through," Rae said. "The door is open to serious discussion in Canada — and between Canada and NATO — about what the future looks like."
 
A few days later, on Tuesday, June 8, the Hon. Hugh Segal addressed the Senate with these words:
 
There is now an opportunity for a full parliamentary debate in both chambers — not a narrow partisan debate, but a broad, multi-partisan, national interest debate — where proposals for the mix of forces and civilians deployed to Afghanistan can be openly and frankly discussed.
 
Support is even coming from places you might not expect, such as the Toronto Star editorial page:
 
While many Canadians will welcome the end of our primary fighting role, there’s solid support for providing expertise and aid to help Afghans rebuild after decades of misrule, invasion and civil war. If we can train troops and police without being directly embroiled in combat, that too is worth considering.
 
How you can help at this critical time:

Write to your MP if you haven't already. When politicians such as Bob Rae have the courage to take leadership on this issue, it is incumbent on us to show them our support and urge our government to decide on a responsible policy for the future. Pasted below this main message is a template you can adapt as a letter, if you wish. You can also look at our usual tips for writing MPs at http://afghanistan-canada-solidarity.org/write-your-mp

Engage the Media with letters to the editor and Op Eds. Get the word out any way you can in your local newspaper or on your social networking sites. For tips, go to http://afghanistan-canada-solidarity.org/engage-media

 
Please make your voices heard.

Sincerely,

Jonathon Narvey
CASC Secretary of the Board

-------
TEMPLATE LETTER CONTENT

For too long, our politicians in Ottawa have been scandalously quiet on the question of what our country will be doing after 2011 in Afghanistan. We know that the 2008 motion passed by parliament calls for an end to the combat mission in Kandahar in 2011, but there are many other ways that Canada can continue to help build a stable Afghan democracy.

But instead of initiating a debate about this, the Prime Minister and his cabinet have been hiding behind the 2008 motion, acting as if it rules out any future Canadian mission. Furthermore, in the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, opposition MPs have consistently refused to adopt a motion put forward by Laurie Hawn to consider the future of our commitment to Afghanistan, preferring to use all of their time on the detainee issue.

Thus, I was extremely grateful to hear Bob Rae’s comments as he returned from Afghanistan, calling for a serious, mature discussion on how Canada can continue to partner with NATO, the UN, and the Afghan government. Finally a politician has shown the courage and leadership necessary to break this deadlock.

So as a Canadian citizen and a proud member of the Canada Afghanistan Solidarity Committee, I urge all of our MPs and Senators to take Bob Rae’s lead and initiate this discussion that is so badly needed. This is a defining issue for our country; this is about who we are. And Afghans desperately need our help.

Fighting for the Rule of Law in Afghanistan

If Afghanistan is going to develop a civil society that can function over the long term, there must be rule of law. The country faces a challenge in ensuring that human rights and basic criminal law functions according to international norms, but this is not necessarily a unique or insurmountable problem. Terry Glavin writes in the Calgary Herald:

 

Afghanistan's 2004 Constitution demands that no law must offend the Qur'an. But the Constitution also requires that all laws must be consistent with international human rights standards and conventions. It's not going to be an easy fit, Faizi concedes. But it doesn't have to be as fractious as one might think.
 
Where the "West" gets it wrong is in a failure to appreciate that like the English common law tradition, sharia is a vast body of laws, most of which are inoffensive to universal human rights norms. But the semiliterate political appointees that often end up as Afghan judges also get it wrong. Sharia forbids a range of practices -- forced marriage, for one -- that are commonly presumed to be authorized by the Qur'an.
 
Further to the Koran's injunction that "there is no compulsion" in Islam, the Afghan Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the presumption of innocence, and equality between men and women.
 
There will be nasty conflicts in the construction of a progressive human rights regime in a terrain of backward interpretations of sharia: "The Islamic extremists, they will react against us," Faizi said. But for the moment, the Afghan people face a more formidable challenge.
 
"The problem is that mostly there is no fair trial," Faizi told me. "What is really important is the practice of law. We need very strong evidences in order to find a person guilty, but it does not work like this."

Afghanistan's 2004 Constitution demands that no law must offend the Qur'an. But the Constitution also requires that all laws must be consistent with international human rights standards and conventions. It's not going to be an easy fit, Faizi concedes. But it doesn't have to be as fractious as one might think.

Where the "West" gets it wrong is in a failure to appreciate that like the English common law tradition, sharia is a vast body of laws, most of which are inoffensive to universal human rights norms. But the semiliterate political appointees that often end up as Afghan judges also get it wrong. Sharia forbids a range of practices -- forced marriage, for one -- that are commonly presumed to be authorized by the Qur'an.

Further to the Koran's injunction that "there is no compulsion" in Islam, the Afghan Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the presumption of innocence, and equality between men and women.

There will be nasty conflicts in the construction of a progressive human rights regime in a terrain of backward interpretations of sharia: "The Islamic extremists, they will react against us," Faizi said. But for the moment, the Afghan people face a more formidable challenge.

"The problem is that mostly there is no fair trial," Faizi told me. "What is really important is the practice of law. We need very strong evidences in order to find a person guilty, but it does not work like this."

Posted by Jonathon Narvey on June 13, 2010 - 10:51pm

Memorial Ride for the Fallen in Afghanistan

Canadian soldiers who have fallen in Afghanistan were honored in the Memorial Ride for the Fallen in Afghanistan this weekend. The soldiers certainly do deserve our support for their essential work as part of the international mission  helping the people of Afghanistan. I was glad to see this proposal from participant Sean Loucks about a BC-based Highway of Heroes, as quoted in the CBC:

"It would be nice to have [a highway] out here 'cause it's not just soldiers from Ontario, it's soldiers from across Canada … we lose soldiers from across this great nation of ours so to have one out here would be amazing."

Hon. Hugh Segal's Statement on Afghanstan

A very positive statement from a Canadian Senator, the Hon. Hugh Segal, on Canada's role in Afghanistan:

    Hon. Hugh Segal: Honourable senators, I am rising to express my profound appreciation to the members of the House of Commons' Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, who visited Afghanistan recently and returned late last week. They did so to make their own assessment of the situation on the ground and to see first-hand the remarkable work being done by Canadian Forces and humanitarian, development and diplomatic personnel.

    Members of Parliament Kevin Sorenson, Byron Wilfert, Jim Abbott, Claude Bachand, Bob Dechert, Jack Harris, Laurie Hawn, Deepak Obhrai, Bob Rae and Pascal-Pierre Paillé, who made the trip, deserve our appreciation and gratitude, as do those who facilitated their movements on both the military and civilian sides.

    When I rose in this place on March 30 to express hope that there would be a full parliamentary debate on next steps in Afghanistan after 2011 and my strong view that, whatever the configuration of the post-2011 Canadian contingent, Canadian Armed Forces be part of that presence, I was hopeful that our colleagues in the other place would have a chance to see the context for themselves.

    There is now an opportunity for a full parliamentary debate in both chambers — not a narrow partisan debate, but a broad, multi-partisan, national interest debate — where proposals for the mix of forces and civilians deployed to Afghanistan can be openly and frankly discussed.

    Canadian Forces were involved in the earliest assaults on Taliban strongholds. Canadians helped to stabilize Kabul to allow the formation of the first Afghan government, the democratic process and subsequent elections. Canadian Forces were then deployed to Kandahar province, the most violent and difficult of areas, to hold the line almost alone and contain the insurgency so people in other parts of Afghanistan could get on with their lives.

    None of us can know what the final phase in Afghanistan will bring in terms of a constructive framework for stability and self-government, but it is clear that Canadian military experience, perspective, local sensitivity and highly-trained capacities need to be a vital part of that final phase.

H/T to the Canada-Afghanistan Blog and the MilNews blog

Posted by Jonathon Narvey on June 11, 2010 - 9:41am